Petition to make Lily James BABY (and other feminist rants)


One of the greatest photos ever taken, probably

Amongst the Marvel Superhero epics and the Hollywood remakes, a marvelous, original, gem of a movie has risen from development hell to become hit. Edgar Wright’s BABY DRIVER may not be number one at the box office, but it’s critical acclaim and unique point of view (as well as a killer soundtrack) has cemented BABY DRIVER as the success it was meant to be. Sara and I thoroughly enjoyed our screening and I have no complaints at all.

Okay I have one complaint; let’s see if you can guess (it rhymes with schwomen).

The thing about BABY DRIVER is that, from start to finish it’s a fantastic movie. It’s a fairly original concept with a sharp point of view – in my opinion, this is what audiences are starving for. But despite this, all the women featured in the movie served mainly as motivations for the men and in many ways are two dimensional characters. Baby (Ansel Elgort) lost his mother when he was a young child (this is how he got great at driving and living a life of crime) and his love interest Debora (Lily James) seemingly has no motivations or hopes or dreams outside of escaping with Baby into the sunset. And the only other female character, a criminal named Darling (played by the amazing Eliza Gonzalaz), ends up playing second fiddle to her husband Buddy (John Hamm), in a way I can’t fully describe without giving away spoilers. Overall, the women in the movie were created and served to make all the Dude Plots stronger.

Now we’ve talked about this issue on the blog before, and it’s a fairly consistent criticism of Hollywood – we all know this. And I don’t want this to deter people from seeing the movie. In fact, BABY DRIVER does a better job than most movie in portraying women; these characters are fairly diverse and go against the mainstream ideas of what women should be.

But what’s honestly so tiring about seeing this over and over, is that the problem is just so easy to fix. We just need to start swapping all the genders in movie scripts. If we just switched Lily James’ and Ansel Elgort’s roles in the movie, (save a few minor changes to the script), I truly believe the end result would be the same. Instead of watching Baby as a young man, as he tries to find his way after getting in with the wrong crowd, making music in his bedroom and driving really fast, we could have watched Lily James do basically the exact same thing. I know this seems like a small change, but I think it’s revolutionary. When is the last time you saw a female character, that isn’t a superhero, occupy a space on screen that never once drew attention to the fact that she was a girl? And when has an action movie ever showcased such a morally complex character like Baby, who also happens to have a vagina?

Perhaps for many in Hollywood, it’s hard to imagine a girl occupying the same space they believe boys to occupy. But how many women out in the world have grown up watching their mother be abused, loving music, taking care of their foster parents, and learning everything they can about cars, inside and out? It’s not hard to believe that those women exist. And we do ourselves a disservice to not try and portray them.


Can’t you just imagine Lily drifting through NYC in her cute Subaru??

Of course, there are great and important films out there that star women and make women look like real human beings – I’m not talking about those. And this isn’t a jab at movies like Wonder Women either, which opened the doors for all the future female-lead super hero movies I hope to see in the future (such as ATOMIC BLONDE, which looks GREAT). But not every movie has to be a revolutionary new look at women’s experiences in the world or a movie about how women can still kick your ass despite having boobs. Sometimes you just want to watch a bunch of people drive cars really fast, and it would be nice if more of those characters were women.

I am reminded of a scene in the recent Netflix original series GLOW. Allison Brie’s character, Ruth Wilder, is auditioning for a acting job – it’s an intense scene and she delivers it well but as she finishes, the casting woman points out that Ruth has read the wrong part, the part for the male character not the female character. Ruth apologizes, saying she was mistaken, but later after the audition, confides in her friends that she knew she was reading the part for the male character, not the female character. “It was the better part.” Ruth says.

This is, I believe, the crux of this issue. Men in Hollywood are consistently given better parts – roles that showcase a wide range of human emotion – that are wise and strong, or weak-willed and vulnerable. These roles are created without a second thought and, save any bad story telling, audiences usually accept these characters at face value and don’t really question whether their motivations are realistic. But audiences aren’t stupid; they know what’s believable and what’s not. We shouldn’t assume that because we’ve never shown a women in a particular space before, that means she can’t occupy it. If we believe only certain kinds of people in the world are worth showing on screen, we erase real people from these narratives.

People of color have been battling this a long time as well. When Donald Glover made a bid for Spider-Man (back before Andrew Garfield got the role), he received a lot of racial backlash. He says the most frustrating note he got was from someone who said that Peter Parker can’t be black because there are no black people who have grown up and act like Peter. Which is incredulous – “you think there aren’t any black kids in queens who like science and do photography?” Donald fired back.

I think what it comes down to is imagining people complexly. I don’t think we need to create entirely new spaces for women or for people of color that only they can occupy. Instead, I want us and them to occupy the spaces we always have; without the burden of being products or objects for men or for the plot. And more than that, I want stories that let women be women and let black people be black people without talking about whether or not these characters represent society’s idea of what a they should be.

And I would like more movies like Baby Driver on screen. I want a lot of things okay?

In the coming days, I will be finding scripts on the internet and swapping the genders to give actual examples of how easy my proposal would be. I also encourage you to follow this twitter, which showcases the various sexist ways women are introduced in scripts, to learn more.



Cool Guys Don’t Look at Explosions

Kelly wrote last week about her casual love of disaster movies. It was such a lovely piece about memory and my totally bizarre sense of humor that I figured why not continue the conversation with my casual love of action movies.

Spoiler alert: there’s nothing casual about it.

fast-furious-7Additionally, my love of action movies does not have anything to do with memories of my beloved sister, unless you count a three year long fight about how you define the quality of “good” in art and narrative, or said sister saying VERY MEAN THINGS to me about my VERY REAL sadness regarding the death of Paul Walker.

For reals though, she’s pretty cool. I kind of like her. But back to me.

I love action movies. I love the destruction, and how, if you thought about it, it would probably be devastating, but action movies don’t give you time to think about it. I particularly love action movies are the ones that involve the team-as-family trope. Where a group of disparate people, usually the best at what they do, join forces and find themselves with people to fight for as much as a cause. I like the celebration of excellence, and the way heroes are complicated. I like heroes in general.

There is some degree of escapism here and for a lot of people that may be all these stories are. And that’s fine. I am not going to lie – part of the draw of action movies is that they bear no resemblance to real life. As much as I would like to, I am never going to be involved in a giant robot battle to save the earth. And yes, some of it is the unrealistically simple plot lines.

I firmly believe, however, that there can be something less escapist and more critical about action movies. In every story, in every genre, there is art and valuable conversations to be had. Of course it doesn’t always work – the Fast and the Furious movies could have done something really interesting about a segment of society largely abandoned by their government because of their race and socio-economic class. They gesture at it sometimes, but mostly its just family and fast cars. And I like that too.

1336415353_pdc_theavengersteamBut for example, the Marvel movies explore what it means to be a hero vs. what it means to be human. I think their heroes are super interesting because their faults and strengths are magnified by their powers in equal measure. Also there is something there about disability and mental trauma – something that would be more interesting if they stuck to canon and made Hawkeye deaf in the movies. Kelly’s favorites, ye olde disaster movies, are another good one because there is so much (appropriate) anxiety these days about climate change and what we’ve done to this planet of ours.

And this would be a really wonderful time to transition into talking about Mad Max: Fury Road, which manages to be an action movie with incredible critical insights and little to no escapism. But that’s a whole other blog post in itself.

For me action movies are fun. I love their simplicity, their lack of consequences, their team dynamics. The more robots and space ships the better. But I also love thinking about action movies, poking and prodding them into a place where, like in all good art, we can see an interpretation or a critical investigation of ourselves. Perhaps if we stopped dismissing them, people would be more willing to see their critical potential.

Or maybe I just like watching things blow up.